| Title |
A pilot cost-analysis study comparing AI-based EyeArt® and ophthalmologist assessment of diabetic retinopathy in minority women in Oslo, Norway / |
| Authors |
Karabeg, Mia ; Petrovski, Goran ; Hertzberg, Silvia Nw ; Erke, Maja Gran ; Fosmark, Dag Sigurd ; Russell, Greg ; Moe, Morten C ; Volke, Vallo ; Raudonis, Vidas ; Verkauskiene, Rasa ; Sokolovska, Jelizaveta ; Haugen, Inga-Britt Kjellevold ; Petrovski, Beata Eva |
| DOI |
10.1186/s40942-024-00547-3 |
| Full Text |
|
| Is Part of |
International journal of retina and vitreous.. London : BioMed central. 2024, vol. 10, iss. 1, art. no. 40, p. 1-9.. ISSN 2056-9920 |
| Keywords [eng] |
artificial intelligence ; automated grading ; cost-analysis ; diabetic retinopathy ; manual grading ; minority women ; Norway ; screening |
| Abstract [eng] |
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading cause of adult blindness in the working age population worldwide, which can be prevented by early detection. Regular eye examinations are recommended and crucial for detecting sight-threatening DR. Use of artificial intelligence (AI) to lessen the burden on the healthcare system is needed. PURPOSE: To perform a pilot cost-analysis study for detecting DR in a cohort of minority women with DM in Oslo, Norway, that have the highest prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in the country, using both manual (ophthalmologist) and autonomous (AI) grading. This is the first study in Norway, as far as we know, that uses AI in DR- grading of retinal images. METHODS: On Minority Women's Day, November 1, 2017, in Oslo, Norway, 33 patients (66 eyes) over 18 years of age diagnosed with DM (T1D and T2D) were screened. The Eidon - True Color Confocal Scanner (CenterVue, United States) was used for retinal imaging and graded for DR after screening had been completed, by an ophthalmologist and automatically, using EyeArt Automated DR Detection System, version 2.1.0 (EyeArt, EyeNuk, CA, USA). The gradings were based on the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) severity scale [1] detecting the presence or absence of referable DR. Cost-minimization analyses were performed for both grading methods. RESULTS: 33 women (64 eyes) were eligible for the analysis. A very good inter-rater agreement was found: 0.98 (P < 0.01), between the human and AI-based EyeArt grading system for detecting DR. The prevalence of DR was 18.6% (95% CI: 11.4-25.8%), and the sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI: 100-100% and 95% CI: 100-100%), respectively. The cost difference for AI screening compared to human screening was $143 lower per patient (cost-saving) in favour of AI. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that The EyeArt AI system is both a reliable, cost-saving, and useful tool for DR grading in clinical practice. |
| Published |
London : BioMed central |
| Type |
Journal article |
| Language |
English |
| Publication date |
2024 |
| CC license |
|
