Title Digital assets: risks, regulations, mitigation
Authors Teng, Huei-Wen ; Härdle, Wolfgang Karl ; Osterrieder, Joerg ; Pele, Daniel Traian ; Baals, Lennart John ; Papavassiliou, Vassilios ; Bolesta, Karolina ; Kabašinskas, Audrius ; Filipovska, Olivija ; Thomaidis, Nikolaos S ; Moukas, Alexios-Ioannis ; Goundar, Sam ; Nasir, Jamal Abdul ; Weinberg, Abraham Itzhak ; Arakelian, Veni ; Truică, Ciprian-Octavian ; Akar, Mutlu ; Kabaklarlı, Esra ; Apostol, Elena-Simona ; Iannario, Maria ; Bȩdowska-Sójka, Barbara ; Skaftadóttir, Hanna Kristín ; Yildirim, Ozgur ; Shala, Albulena ; Pisoni, Galena ; Coita, Ioana Florina ; Korba, Szabolcs ; Hafner, Christian M ; Schwendner, Peter ; Molnár, Bálint ; Xhumari, Elda
DOI 10.1186/s40854-025-00848-y
Full Text Download
Is Part of Financial innovation.. New York : Springer. 2026, vol. 12, art. no. 65, p. 1-48.. ISSN 2199-4730
Abstract [eng] Digital assets (DAs) such as cryptocurrencies, tokenized securities, stablecoins, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and central bank digital currencies, are transforming financial markets with new business models, investment opportunities, and transaction efficiencies. Underpinned by blockchain, distributed ledger technology, and smart contracts, digital innovations are reshaping the financial ecosystem. However, their rapid growth introduces substantial risks, including fraud, market manipulation, cybersecurity threats, and regulatory uncertainty. This position paper offers an interdisciplinary and empirically grounded analysis of the DA landscape. We define and classify major asset types, trace their evolution from speculative instruments to functional tools, and assess current adoption trends. Additional technological developments (e.g., decentralized finance and NFT expansion) are examined for their role in accelerating this transformation. We also analyze the global regulatory landscape, highlighting jurisdictional differences, classification challenges, and emerging governance frameworks. To address key risks, we derive mitigation strategies via quantitative analysis and case-based evidence. The risks include balancing innovation with investor protection through adaptive regulatory design, promoting cross-border regulatory harmonization to prevent arbitrage and fragmentation, and supporting experimentation through regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs. By adopting a forward-looking, evidence-based, and collaborative regulatory approaches, stakeholders can harness the benefits of DAs while managing systemic risks and maintaining market integrity.
Published New York : Springer
Type Journal article
Language English
Publication date 2026
CC license CC license description